China, mainland vs Nigeria: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)

China, mainland
38,925 million SLC
in 2023
Nigeria
104,569 million SLC
in 2023
China, mainland rank
16th
Nigeria rank
11th

Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) over time

  • China, mainland
  • Nigeria
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k200420132023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 104,569 million SLC against 38,925 million SLC in China, mainland, a difference of 65,644 million SLC.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 2.7 times China, mainland's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.

China, mainland ranks 16th and Nigeria ranks 11th of 97 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s 8,534 million SLC 35,182 million SLC 26,648 million SLC Nigeria
2010s 17,977 million SLC 58,674 million SLC 40,697 million SLC Nigeria
2020s 34,142 million SLC 106,795 million SLC 72,652 million SLC Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency), China, mainland or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 104,569 million SLC against 38,925 million SLC in China, mainland as of 2023.
What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) between China, mainland and Nigeria?
65,644 million SLC, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Nigeria?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do China, mainland and Nigeria rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency)?
China, mainland ranks 16th and Nigeria ranks 11th of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Nigeria: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-total-government-higher/china-mainland/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-total-government-higher/china-mainland/nigeria/">China, mainland vs Nigeria: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 1,334 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.