Mozambique vs Turkey: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency, 2015)

Mozambique
645.26 million SLC
in 2023
Turkey
580.73 million SLC
in 2023
Mozambique rank
57th
Turkey rank
59th

Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency, 2015) over time

  • Mozambique
  • Turkey
0200400600800200420132023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 645.26 million SLC against 580.73 million SLC in Turkey, a difference of 64.53 million SLC.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Turkey's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Turkey ahead.

Mozambique ranks 57th and Turkey ranks 59th of 97 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Turkey Difference Ahead
2000s 403.2 million SLC 710.35 million SLC 307.15 million SLC Turkey
2010s 443.14 million SLC 672.28 million SLC 229.15 million SLC Turkey
2020s 629.43 million SLC 538.66 million SLC 90.77 million SLC Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency, 2015), Mozambique or Turkey?
Mozambique, at 645.26 million SLC against 580.73 million SLC in Turkey as of 2023.
What is the difference in total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency, 2015) between Mozambique and Turkey?
64.53 million SLC, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Turkey?
7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Turkey rank globally for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency, 2015)?
Mozambique ranks 57th and Turkey ranks 59th of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Turkey: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency, 2015). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-total/mozambique/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-total/mozambique/turkiye/">Mozambique vs Turkey: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency, 2015)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 1,333 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.