Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Singapore: Total Credit — Value US$

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
330,552 million USD
in 2024
Singapore
624,838 million USD
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
21st
Singapore rank
18th

Total Credit — Value US$ over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Singapore
0200.0k400.0k600.0k199120072024

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 624,838 million USD against 330,552 million USD in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 294,286 million USD.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.9 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st and Singapore ranks 18th of 29 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 6,768 million USD 69,836 million USD 63,068 million USD Singapore
2000s 48,555 million USD 124,783 million USD 76,228 million USD Singapore
2010s 169,895 million USD 426,259 million USD 256,364 million USD Singapore
2020s 276,199 million USD 581,041 million USD 304,842 million USD Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total credit — value us$, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Singapore?
Singapore, at 624,838 million USD against 330,552 million USD in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in total credit — value us$ between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Singapore?
294,286 million USD, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Singapore?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Singapore rank globally for total credit — value us$?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st and Singapore ranks 18th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Singapore: Total Credit — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-credit-value-us/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-credit-value-us/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/singapore/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Singapore: Total Credit — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Credit — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
210 places, 5,166 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.