Aruba vs Ecuador: Total Credit — Value US$
Total Credit — Value US$ over time
- Aruba
- Ecuador
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 2,334 million USD against 1,928 million USD in Ecuador, a difference of 406 million USD.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 135th and Ecuador ranks 138th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,368 million USD | 362.78 million USD | 1,005 million USD | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1,628 million USD | 1,317 million USD | 311.47 million USD | Aruba |
| 2020s | 1,921 million USD | 2,071 million USD | 150.64 million USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total credit — value us$, Aruba or Ecuador?
- Aruba, at 2,334 million USD against 1,928 million USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total credit — value us$ between Aruba and Ecuador?
- 406 million USD, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Ecuador?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Aruba and Ecuador rank globally for total credit — value us$?
- Aruba ranks 135th and Ecuador ranks 138th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.