Argentina vs Belarus: Total Credit — Value US$
Total Credit — Value US$ over time
- Argentina
- Belarus
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 24,400 million USD against 24,370 million USD in Belarus, a difference of 30 million USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 80th and Belarus ranks 81st of 178 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67,971 million USD | 1,483 million USD | 66,488 million USD | Argentina |
| 2000s | 40,301 million USD | 6,298 million USD | 34,003 million USD | Argentina |
| 2010s | 81,635 million USD | 20,294 million USD | 61,342 million USD | Argentina |
| 2020s | 39,892 million USD | 22,486 million USD | 17,406 million USD | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total credit — value us$, Argentina or Belarus?
- Argentina, at 24,400 million USD against 24,370 million USD in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total credit — value us$ between Argentina and Belarus?
- 30 million USD, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Belarus?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Belarus rank globally for total credit — value us$?
- Argentina ranks 80th and Belarus ranks 81st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.