Eritrea vs Malawi: Total Credit — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Credit — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Eritrea
- Malawi
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1,350 million USD against 1,058 million USD in Malawi, a difference of 292 million USD.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 134th and Malawi ranks 137th of 166 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 394.05 million USD | 264.82 million USD | 129.23 million USD | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 618.1 million USD | 809.14 million USD | 191.04 million USD | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total credit — value us$, 2015 prices, Eritrea or Malawi?
- Eritrea, at 1,350 million USD against 1,058 million USD in Malawi as of 2014.
- What is the difference in total credit — value us$, 2015 prices between Eritrea and Malawi?
- 292 million USD, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Malawi?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Eritrea and Malawi rank globally for total credit — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Eritrea ranks 134th and Malawi ranks 137th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.