Bangladesh vs Finland: Total Credit — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Credit — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Bangladesh
- Finland
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 128,622 million USD against 101,874 million USD in Finland, a difference of 26,748 million USD.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.3 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Finland ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 38th and Finland ranks 41st of 166 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70,073 million USD | 81,185 million USD | 11,112 million USD | Finland |
| 2020s | 111,520 million USD | 101,657 million USD | 9,863 million USD | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total credit — value us$, 2015 prices, Bangladesh or Finland?
- Bangladesh, at 128,622 million USD against 101,874 million USD in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total credit — value us$, 2015 prices between Bangladesh and Finland?
- 26,748 million USD, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Finland?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Bangladesh and Finland rank globally for total credit — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Bangladesh ranks 38th and Finland ranks 41st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.