Aruba vs Ecuador: Total Credit — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Credit — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Aruba
- Ecuador
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 2,094 million USD against 1,813 million USD in Ecuador, a difference of 281 million USD.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 125th and Ecuador ranks 127th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,570 million USD | 434.57 million USD | 1,135 million USD | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1,730 million USD | 1,291 million USD | 439.38 million USD | Aruba |
| 2020s | 1,888 million USD | 1,989 million USD | 101.43 million USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total credit — value us$, 2015 prices, Aruba or Ecuador?
- Aruba, at 2,094 million USD against 1,813 million USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total credit — value us$, 2015 prices between Aruba and Ecuador?
- 281 million USD, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Ecuador?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Aruba and Ecuador rank globally for total credit — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Aruba ranks 125th and Ecuador ranks 127th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.