Libya vs Qatar: Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Libya
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 36,214 million SLC against 30,802 million SLC in Libya, a difference of 5,412 million SLC.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 130th and Qatar ranks 129th of 174 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,406 million SLC | 21,871 million SLC | 18,465 million SLC | Qatar |
| 2000s | 4,318 million SLC | 33,208 million SLC | 28,890 million SLC | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total credit — value standard local currency, Libya or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 36,214 million SLC against 30,802 million SLC in Libya as of 2002.
- What is the difference in total credit — value standard local currency between Libya and Qatar?
- 5,412 million SLC, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Qatar?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2002.
- How do Libya and Qatar rank globally for total credit — value standard local currency?
- Libya ranks 130th and Qatar ranks 129th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.