Latvia vs Papua New Guinea: Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Latvia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 12,431 million SLC against 12,117 million SLC in Latvia, a difference of 314 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 139th and Papua New Guinea ranks 138th of 165 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12,885 million SLC | 8,992 million SLC | 3,893 million SLC | Latvia |
| 2020s | 11,030 million SLC | 11,027 million SLC | 2.1 million SLC | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total credit — value standard local currency, Latvia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 12,431 million SLC against 12,117 million SLC in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total credit — value standard local currency between Latvia and Papua New Guinea?
- 314 million SLC, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for total credit — value standard local currency?
- Latvia ranks 139th and Papua New Guinea ranks 138th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.