Cabo Verde vs United Republic of Tanzania: Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency

Cabo Verde
145,464 million SLC
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
31.06 million million SLC
in 2023
Cabo Verde rank
3rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • United Republic of Tanzania
010.0M20.0M30.0M199320082024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 31.06 million million SLC against 145,464 million SLC in Cabo Verde, a difference of 30.92 million million SLC.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 213.5 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 3 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 15,040 million SLC 1.89 million million SLC 1.87 million million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 69,739 million SLC 12.77 million million SLC 12.70 million million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 125,698 million SLC 24.96 million million SLC 24.83 million million SLC United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total credit — value standard local currency, Cabo Verde or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 31.06 million million SLC against 145,464 million SLC in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in total credit — value standard local currency between Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania?
30.92 million million SLC, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for total credit — value standard local currency?
Cabo Verde ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs United Republic of Tanzania: Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-credit-value-standard-local-currency/cabo-verde-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/total-credit-value-standard-local-currency/cabo-verde-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Cabo Verde vs United Republic of Tanzania: Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
177 places, 4,557 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.