Bahrain vs Latvia: Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Bahrain
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 12,117 million SLC against 11,162 million SLC in Bahrain, a difference of 955 million SLC.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Bahrain's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 141st and Latvia ranks 139th of 165 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7,563 million SLC | 12,885 million SLC | 5,321 million SLC | Latvia |
| 2020s | 10,636 million SLC | 11,030 million SLC | 393.56 million SLC | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total credit — value standard local currency, Bahrain or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 12,117 million SLC against 11,162 million SLC in Bahrain as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total credit — value standard local currency between Bahrain and Latvia?
- 955 million SLC, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Bahrain and Latvia rank globally for total credit — value standard local currency?
- Bahrain ranks 141st and Latvia ranks 139th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.