Latvia vs Sudan: Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices over time
- Latvia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 9,382 million SLC against 8,520 million SLC in Latvia, a difference of 862 million SLC.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 135th and Sudan ranks 133rd of 165 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11,812 million SLC | 59,045 million SLC | 47,233 million SLC | Sudan |
| 2020s | 8,778 million SLC | 31,666 million SLC | 22,888 million SLC | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total credit — value standard local currency, 2015 prices, Latvia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 9,382 million SLC against 8,520 million SLC in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in total credit — value standard local currency, 2015 prices between Latvia and Sudan?
- 862 million SLC, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Sudan rank globally for total credit — value standard local currency, 2015 prices?
- Latvia ranks 135th and Sudan ranks 133rd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.