Ecuador vs Namibia: Total Credit β Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Total Credit β Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1,813 million SLC against 1,355 million SLC in Namibia, a difference of 458 million SLC.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Namibia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 157th of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 434.57 million SLC | 1,634 million SLC | 1,200 million SLC | Namibia |
| 2010s | 1,291 million SLC | 1,379 million SLC | 88.05 million SLC | Namibia |
| 2020s | 1,989 million SLC | 1,502 million SLC | 486.94 million SLC | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total credit β value standard local currency, 2015 prices, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Ecuador, at 1,813 million SLC against 1,355 million SLC in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in total credit β value standard local currency, 2015 prices between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 458 million SLC, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for total credit β value standard local currency, 2015 prices?
- Ecuador ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 157th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Credit β Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each countryβs central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.