Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.46 % change on previous year
in 2024
Russian Federation
14.97 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
10th
Russian Federation rank
9th

Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Russian Federation
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 14.97 % change on previous year against 1.46 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 13.51 % change on previous year.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 10.2 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 9th of 28 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s -0.6104 % change on previous year 0.4794 % change on previous year 1.09 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2000s 2.68 % change on previous year 4.31 % change on previous year 1.63 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2010s 0.8313 % change on previous year 7.37 % change on previous year 6.54 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2020s 2.17 % change on previous year 1.81 % change on previous year 0.3525 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — yield, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 14.97 % change on previous year against 1.46 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in tomatoes — yield, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation?
13.51 % change on previous year, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for tomatoes — yield, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 9th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-yield-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-yield-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/russian-federation-2/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,341 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Yield. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.