Congo vs Nauru: Tomatoes — Production, per square kilometre
Congo
0.0113 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru
0.0235 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
139th
Nauru rank
136th
Tomatoes — Production, per square kilometre over time
- Congo
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0.0235 t per square kilometre against 0.0113 t per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0122 t per square kilometre.
That makes Nauru's figure about 2.1 times Congo's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 139th and Nauru ranks 136th of 148 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0113 t per square kilometre | 0.0233 t per square kilometre | 0.012 t per square kilometre | Nauru |
| 2020s | 0.0114 t per square kilometre | 0.0234 t per square kilometre | 0.0119 t per square kilometre | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tomatoes — production, per square kilometre, Congo or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 0.0235 t per square kilometre against 0.0113 t per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in tomatoes — production, per square kilometre between Congo and Nauru?
- 0.0122 t per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nauru?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Nauru rank globally for tomatoes — production, per square kilometre?
- Congo ranks 139th and Nauru ranks 136th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tomatoes — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.