Japan vs Latvia: Tomatoes — Production, per capita
Japan
0.0053 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0049 t per person
in 2024
Japan rank
92nd
Latvia rank
93rd
Tomatoes — Production, per capita over time
- Japan
- Latvia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.0053 t per person against 0.0049 t per person in Latvia, a difference of 0.0004 t per person.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 92nd and Latvia ranks 93rd of 148 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0061 t per person | 0.0022 t per person | 0.0039 t per person | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.0059 t per person | 0.0031 t per person | 0.0028 t per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.0057 t per person | 0.0029 t per person | 0.0028 t per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.0056 t per person | 0.003 t per person | 0.0025 t per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tomatoes — production, per capita, Japan or Latvia?
- Japan, at 0.0053 t per person against 0.0049 t per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tomatoes — production, per capita between Japan and Latvia?
- 0.0004 t per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Latvia rank globally for tomatoes — production, per capita?
- Japan ranks 92nd and Latvia ranks 93rd of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tomatoes — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.