Eswatini vs Latvia: Tomatoes — Production, per capita
Eswatini
0.0045 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0049 t per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
95th
Latvia rank
93rd
Tomatoes — Production, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0049 t per person against 0.0045 t per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0004 t per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 95th and Latvia ranks 93rd of 148 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0036 t per person | 0.0022 t per person | 0.0014 t per person | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.0034 t per person | 0.0031 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0046 t per person | 0.0029 t per person | 0.0017 t per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0045 t per person | 0.003 t per person | 0.0014 t per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tomatoes — production, per capita, Eswatini or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0049 t per person against 0.0045 t per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tomatoes — production, per capita between Eswatini and Latvia?
- 0.0004 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Latvia rank globally for tomatoes — production, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 95th and Latvia ranks 93rd of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tomatoes — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.