Cabo Verde vs United Republic of Tanzania: Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate

Cabo Verde
4.53 % change on previous year
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
-3.34 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cabo Verde rank
12th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
15th

Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-1000100200196219932024

How they compare

Cabo Verde currently reports 4.53 % change on previous year against -3.34 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 7.87 % change on previous year.

That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Cabo Verde ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 28 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 % change on previous year 12.75 % change on previous year 12.75 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 0 % change on previous year 6.95 % change on previous year 6.95 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 37.39 % change on previous year 7.19 % change on previous year 30.2 % change on previous year Cabo Verde
1990s 19.18 % change on previous year 3.55 % change on previous year 15.64 % change on previous year Cabo Verde
2000s 25.96 % change on previous year 6.55 % change on previous year 19.41 % change on previous year Cabo Verde
2010s -0.4044 % change on previous year 7.1 % change on previous year 7.5 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2020s -5.91 % change on previous year 3 % change on previous year 8.91 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — production, annual growth rate, Cabo Verde or United Republic of Tanzania?
Cabo Verde, at 4.53 % change on previous year against -3.34 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in tomatoes — production, annual growth rate between Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania?
7.87 % change on previous year, with Cabo Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for tomatoes — production, annual growth rate?
Cabo Verde ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 28 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs United Republic of Tanzania: Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-production-annual-growth-rate/cabo-verde-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-production-annual-growth-rate/cabo-verde-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Cabo Verde vs United Republic of Tanzania: Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,400 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.