How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Finland?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bangladesh vs Finland: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Bangladesh

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Finland

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Bangladesh rank

82nd

Finland rank

85th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Bangladesh
Finland

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Finland, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 82nd and Finland ranks 85th of 124 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bangladesh	Finland	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Bangladesh or Finland?: Bangladesh, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Bangladesh and Finland?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Finland?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Bangladesh and Finland rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Bangladesh ranks 82nd and Finland ranks 85th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Finland: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/finland/">Bangladesh vs Finland: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 125 places, 6,235 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.