Namibia vs Suriname: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Namibia
0.0033 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
122nd
Suriname rank
121st

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Namibia
  • Suriname
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0033 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0053 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 2.6 times Namibia's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 122nd and Suriname ranks 121st of 124 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0146 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0129 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0026 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0088 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0032 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0134 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0102 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0033 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0074 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Namibia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0033 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Namibia and Suriname?
0.0053 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Namibia ranks 122nd and Suriname ranks 121st of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Suriname: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/suriname/">Namibia vs Suriname: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.