Mexico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Mexico
0.9148 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.9538 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
47th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
46th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Mexico
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0123196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.9538 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9148 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.039 1000 USD per square kilometre.

Across all 38 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 47th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 46th of 124 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 0.4235 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6394 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2159 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.467 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9349 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.5896 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5954 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.7617 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.8794 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6936 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Mexico or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.9538 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9148 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Mexico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.039 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Mexico ranks 47th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 46th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Mexico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.