Mali vs New Zealand: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Mali
0.1503 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.1834 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
97th
New Zealand rank
94th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Mali
  • New Zealand
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.1834 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1503 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 0.0331 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 97th and New Zealand ranks 94th of 124 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0034 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1579 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1545 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.0035 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1918 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1883 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.0084 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2273 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2188 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.014 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3567 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3428 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3271 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2871 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.0823 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2613 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.179 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.1431 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1784 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0353 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Mali or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.1834 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1503 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Mali and New Zealand?
0.0331 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mali and New Zealand rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Mali ranks 97th and New Zealand ranks 94th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs New Zealand: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/new-zealand/">Mali vs New Zealand: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.