Malawi vs Nigeria: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Malawi
3.89 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
3.39 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
15th
Nigeria rank
17th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Malawi
  • Nigeria
01234196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 3.89 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.39 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.5 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Malawi ranks 15th and Nigeria ranks 17th of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0.089 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1726 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0836 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
1970s 0.1341 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2231 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.089 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 0.1747 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3082 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1335 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 0.1999 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6162 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4163 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 0.3067 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 2.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2279 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 3.99 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.814 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Malawi or Nigeria?
Malawi, at 3.89 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.39 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Malawi and Nigeria?
0.5 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nigeria?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Nigeria rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Malawi ranks 15th and Nigeria ranks 17th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Nigeria: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/nigeria/">Malawi vs Nigeria: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.