Madagascar vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Madagascar
0.0155 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
119th
Zambia rank
116th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Madagascar
  • Zambia
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0155 1000 USD per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 0.0096 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.6 times Madagascar's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Madagascar ranks 119th and Zambia ranks 116th of 124 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0022 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0155 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0133 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0049 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0211 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0162 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0052 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0255 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0203 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0064 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0281 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0217 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0235 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0097 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.015 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0256 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0105 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0154 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0097 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Madagascar or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0155 1000 USD per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Madagascar and Zambia?
0.0096 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Zambia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Madagascar ranks 119th and Zambia ranks 116th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/zambia/">Madagascar vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.