El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

El Salvador
0.5866 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.5438 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
61st
Zimbabwe rank
62nd

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zimbabwe
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.5866 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5438 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0428 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 124 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3595 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0103 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3492 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.4382 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0124 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4257 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.6607 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0152 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6456 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.6369 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0201 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6168 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.4734 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.376 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0974 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.5998 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5886 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0112 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
El Salvador, at 0.5866 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5438 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
0.0428 1000 USD per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
El Salvador ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/zimbabwe/">El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.