Egypt vs Mozambique: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Egypt
1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
38th
Mozambique rank
40th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Egypt
  • Mozambique
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 38th and Mozambique ranks 40th of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 6 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2234 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0059 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2174 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 0.3463 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0156 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3308 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 0.633 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0141 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6189 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.941 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0116 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9294 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0986 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.35 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 1.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5374 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8758 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4281 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Egypt or Mozambique?
Egypt, at 1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Egypt and Mozambique?
0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Mozambique rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Egypt ranks 38th and Mozambique ranks 40th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Mozambique: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/mozambique/">Egypt vs Mozambique: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.