Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Costa Rica
1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
44th
Tunisia rank
43rd

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Tunisia
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 43rd of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2035 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.104 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0995 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 0.3056 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2201 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0855 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.3838 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3647 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0191 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.2478 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5583 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3105 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.9755 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8977 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0778 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0786 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1052 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Costa Rica or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Costa Rica and Tunisia?
0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Tunisia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Costa Rica ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 43rd of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/tunisia/">Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.