Costa Rica vs Mexico: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Costa Rica
1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.9148 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
44th
Mexico rank
47th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Mexico
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9148 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.2652 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.3 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 44th and Mexico ranks 47th of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 6 and Mexico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2035 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1177 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0857 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 0.3056 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2485 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0571 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.3838 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3743 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0095 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.2478 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.467 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2192 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.9755 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5896 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3859 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7617 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.366 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8794 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2632 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Costa Rica or Mexico?
Costa Rica, at 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9148 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Costa Rica and Mexico?
0.2652 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Mexico rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Costa Rica ranks 44th and Mexico ranks 47th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Mexico: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/mexico/">Costa Rica vs Mexico: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.