Congo vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Congo
0.0182 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
118th
Zambia rank
116th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Congo
  • Zambia
0.010.0150.020.0250.030.035196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0182 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 118th and Zambia ranks 116th of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0173 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0155 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0304 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0211 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0093 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0319 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0255 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0065 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0236 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0281 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.015 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0235 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0085 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0178 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0256 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0077 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0184 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0067 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Congo or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0251 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0182 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Congo and Zambia?
0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Congo ranks 118th and Zambia ranks 116th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zambia/">Congo vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.