Congo vs Suriname: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Congo
0.0182 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
118th
Suriname rank
121st

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Congo
  • Suriname
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0182 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0096 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 2.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 118th and Suriname ranks 121st of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 6 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0173 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.008 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0093 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0304 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.004 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0264 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0319 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0099 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.022 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0171 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0265 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0094 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0141 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0088 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0178 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0134 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0184 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0074 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.011 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Congo or Suriname?
Congo, at 0.0182 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Congo and Suriname?
0.0096 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Congo ranks 118th and Suriname ranks 121st of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Suriname: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/suriname/">Congo vs Suriname: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.