How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Serbia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Chile

0.8191 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

0.7123 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

50th

Serbia rank

51st

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Chile
Serbia

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.8191 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.7123 1000 USD per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.1068 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 51st of 124 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.8327 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.06 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2301 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	0.8144 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9424 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.128 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	0.7382 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7823 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0441 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Chile or Serbia?: Chile, at 0.8191 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.7123 1000 USD per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Chile and Serbia?: 0.1068 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Chile ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 51st of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Serbia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/serbia/">Chile vs Serbia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.