Chile vs Mexico: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Chile
0.8191 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.9148 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
50th
Mexico rank
47th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Chile
  • Mexico
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.9148 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8191 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0957 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 50th and Mexico ranks 47th of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Mexico in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1536 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1177 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0359 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.1948 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2485 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0537 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.3505 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3743 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0238 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.9681 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.467 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5011 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5896 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4312 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.8144 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7617 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0527 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.7382 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8794 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1412 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Chile or Mexico?
Mexico, at 0.9148 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8191 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Chile and Mexico?
0.0957 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mexico rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Chile ranks 50th and Mexico ranks 47th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mexico: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/mexico/">Chile vs Mexico: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.