Australia vs Iceland: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Australia
0.0297 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0494 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
114th
Iceland rank
112th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Australia
  • Iceland
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0494 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0297 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0197 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.7 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 114th and Iceland ranks 112th of 124 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0139 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0115 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0024 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.0157 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0158 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0232 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0262 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.003 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0324 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0327 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0387 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0545 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0158 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0352 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0602 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.025 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0354 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.052 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0167 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Australia or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.0494 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0297 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Australia and Iceland?
0.0197 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Australia ranks 114th and Iceland ranks 112th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Iceland: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/iceland/">Australia vs Iceland: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.