Russian Federation vs Southern Africa: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Russian Federation
8.19 % change on previous year
in 2024
Southern Africa
-4.19 % change on previous year
in 2024
Russian Federation rank
29th
Southern Africa rank
26th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Southern Africa
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 8.19 % change on previous year against -4.19 % change on previous year in Southern Africa, a difference of 12.38 % change on previous year.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 2.0 times Southern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 29th and Southern Africa ranks 26th of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 3 and Southern Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Southern Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5762 % change on previous year 0.6871 % change on previous year 0.111 % change on previous year Southern Africa
2000s 3.58 % change on previous year 2.4 % change on previous year 1.18 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2010s 3.81 % change on previous year 1.42 % change on previous year 2.39 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2020s -0.1647 % change on previous year -2.27 % change on previous year 2.1 % change on previous year Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Russian Federation or Southern Africa?
Russian Federation, at 8.19 % change on previous year against -4.19 % change on previous year in Southern Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Russian Federation and Southern Africa?
12.38 % change on previous year, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Southern Africa?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Russian Federation and Southern Africa rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Russian Federation ranks 29th and Southern Africa ranks 26th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Southern Africa: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth-rate/russian-federation-2/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth-rate/russian-federation-2/southern-africa/">Russian Federation vs Southern Africa: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 9,317 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.