Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Slovakia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2.59 % change on previous year
in 2024
Slovakia
16.07 % change on previous year
in 2017
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
15th
Slovakia rank
15th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Slovakia
-50050100196219932024

How they compare

Slovakia currently reports 16.07 % change on previous year against 2.59 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 13.48 % change on previous year.

That makes Slovakia's figure about 6.2 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 15th and Slovakia ranks 15th of 30 groups.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Slovakia Difference Ahead
1990s 7.03 % change on previous year -2 % change on previous year 9.03 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 5.37 % change on previous year -0.9565 % change on previous year 6.32 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 16.74 % change on previous year -0.653 % change on previous year 17.39 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Slovakia?
Slovakia, at 16.07 % change on previous year against 2.59 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2017.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Slovakia?
13.48 % change on previous year, with Slovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Slovakia?
24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2017.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Slovakia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 15th and Slovakia ranks 15th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Slovakia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/slovak-republic/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Slovakia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 9,317 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.