Uganda vs Uruguay: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Uganda
0.0932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.0989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda rank
109th
Uruguay rank
106th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Uganda
  • Uruguay
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Uganda ranks 109th and Uruguay ranks 106th of 148 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0621 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0518 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0.0146 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0981 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0811 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0.0261 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0873 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0611 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.0502 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.0848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0969 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.0932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Uganda or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.0989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Uganda and Uruguay?
0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Uganda and Uruguay rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Uganda ranks 109th and Uruguay ranks 106th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uganda vs Uruguay: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/uganda/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/uganda/uruguay/">Uganda vs Uruguay: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.