Panama vs Uruguay: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Panama
0.1258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.0989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
105th
Uruguay rank
106th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Panama
  • Uruguay
0.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.1258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 105th and Uruguay ranks 106th of 148 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0621 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0667 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0.1621 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0494 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0.1927 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0926 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0.1647 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0873 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0775 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2000s 0.1343 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0.1224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0969 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0.1461 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0473 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Panama or Uruguay?
Panama, at 0.1258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Panama and Uruguay?
0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Uruguay rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Panama ranks 105th and Uruguay ranks 106th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Uruguay: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/panama/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/panama/uruguay/">Panama vs Uruguay: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.