Norway vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Norway
0.0197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
132nd
Zambia rank
135th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Norway
  • Zambia
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 132nd and Zambia ranks 135th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0168 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0186 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Norway or Zambia?
Norway, at 0.0197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Norway and Zambia?
0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Zambia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Norway ranks 132nd and Zambia ranks 135th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/norway/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/norway/zambia/">Norway vs Zambia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.