New Zealand vs Uganda: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

New Zealand
0.0943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.0932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
108th
Uganda rank
109th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Uganda
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 108th and Uganda ranks 109th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0812 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0709 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.0986 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0146 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.1169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0978 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.1834 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0261 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1573 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.1682 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0502 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.1343 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0496 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.0917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), New Zealand or Uganda?
New Zealand, at 0.0943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between New Zealand and Uganda?
0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Uganda rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
New Zealand ranks 108th and Uganda ranks 109th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Uganda: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/uganda/">New Zealand vs Uganda: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.