Mauritius vs Tunisia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Mauritius
4.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
11th
Tunisia rank
13th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Tunisia
012345196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 4.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 11th and Tunisia ranks 13th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3386 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.744 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 2.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 2.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 2.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 2.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 3.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6761 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Mauritius or Tunisia?
Mauritius, at 4.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Mauritius and Tunisia?
0.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Tunisia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Mauritius ranks 11th and Tunisia ranks 13th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Tunisia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tunisia/">Mauritius vs Tunisia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.