Mali vs New Zealand: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Mali
0.0961 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
107th
New Zealand rank
108th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Mali
  • New Zealand
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 0.0961 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Mali ranks 107th and New Zealand ranks 108th of 148 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0812 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0986 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0964 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1834 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.0256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1682 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.0526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1343 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.0914 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Mali or New Zealand?
Mali, at 0.0961 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Mali and New Zealand?
0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mali and New Zealand rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Mali ranks 107th and New Zealand ranks 108th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs New Zealand: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mali/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mali/new-zealand/">Mali vs New Zealand: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.