Malawi vs Tunisia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Malawi
3.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
14th
Tunisia rank
13th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Malawi
  • Tunisia
012345196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Malawi ranks 14th and Tunisia ranks 13th of 148 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0802 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3386 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.1209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.1576 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.1803 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.2766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 1.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 3.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4689 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Malawi or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Malawi and Tunisia?
0.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tunisia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Tunisia rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Malawi ranks 14th and Tunisia ranks 13th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Tunisia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/malawi/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/malawi/tunisia/">Malawi vs Tunisia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.