Malawi vs Mauritius: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Malawi
3.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
4.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
14th
Mauritius rank
11th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Malawi
  • Mauritius
012345196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 4.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.4 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Malawi ranks 14th and Mauritius ranks 11th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0802 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.1209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.1576 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.1803 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.2766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 1.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5686 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 3.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Malawi or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 4.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Malawi and Mauritius?
1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mauritius?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Mauritius rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Malawi ranks 14th and Mauritius ranks 11th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Mauritius: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/malawi/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/malawi/mauritius/">Malawi vs Mauritius: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.