Kenya vs Seychelles: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Kenya
0.4671 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles
0.4652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
66th
Seychelles rank
67th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Kenya
  • Seychelles
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 0.4671 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Seychelles, a difference of 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Seychelles ahead.

Kenya ranks 66th and Seychelles ranks 67th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Seychelles in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Seychelles Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0704 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Seychelles
1970s 0.0389 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Seychelles
1980s 0.0493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.165 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Seychelles
1990s 0.1589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1824 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Seychelles
2000s 0.3364 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0517 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kenya
2010s 0.3997 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4343 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0347 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Seychelles
2020s 0.6014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4658 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Kenya or Seychelles?
Kenya, at 0.4671 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Seychelles as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Kenya and Seychelles?
0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Seychelles?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Seychelles rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Kenya ranks 66th and Seychelles ranks 67th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Seychelles: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/kenya/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/kenya/seychelles/">Kenya vs Seychelles: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.