Iraq vs Mozambique: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Iraq
0.5865 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.5644 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
55th
Mozambique rank
58th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Iraq
  • Mozambique
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.5865 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5644 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 55th and Mozambique ranks 58th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 6 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1970s 0.408 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1980s 0.567 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5598 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1990s 0.8852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2000s 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0464 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9877 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 0.7019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.253 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4489 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 0.7304 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0391 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Iraq or Mozambique?
Iraq, at 0.5865 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5644 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Iraq and Mozambique?
0.0221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Mozambique rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Iraq ranks 55th and Mozambique ranks 58th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Mozambique: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iraq/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iraq/mozambique/">Iraq vs Mozambique: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.