Guatemala vs Nigeria: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Guatemala
1.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
26th
Nigeria rank
25th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nigeria
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 26th and Nigeria ranks 25th of 148 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2231 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1214 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.3335 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1315 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.4472 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2656 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.6295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.303 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8533 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2561 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 1.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 1.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0811 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Guatemala or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Guatemala and Nigeria?
0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Nigeria rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Guatemala ranks 26th and Nigeria ranks 25th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Nigeria: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/nigeria/">Guatemala vs Nigeria: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.