Grenada vs Jamaica: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Grenada
0.9971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada rank
42nd
Jamaica rank
39th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Grenada
  • Jamaica
01234196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Grenada, a difference of 0.1229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 42nd and Jamaica ranks 39th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1556 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1718 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 0.105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.0632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8422 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.779 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.0788 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7854 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.1882 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.743 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 1.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
2020s 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Grenada or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Grenada and Jamaica?
0.1229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Jamaica rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Grenada ranks 42nd and Jamaica ranks 39th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Jamaica: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/grenada/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/grenada/jamaica/">Grenada vs Jamaica: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.