Egypt vs Jordan: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Egypt
3.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
3.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
15th
Jordan rank
17th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Egypt
  • Jordan
012345196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 3.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Egypt ranks 15th and Jordan ranks 17th of 148 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 4 and Jordan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3984 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 0.9053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1807 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 1.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 2.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 3.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3168 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 3.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1815 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Egypt or Jordan?
Egypt, at 3.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Egypt and Jordan?
0.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Jordan rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Egypt ranks 15th and Jordan ranks 17th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Jordan: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/jordan/">Egypt vs Jordan: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.