Ecuador vs Peru: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Ecuador
0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
115th
Peru rank
113th

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Peru
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 115th and Peru ranks 113th of 148 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0968 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0174 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.0543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0294 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.1075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.1267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0683 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.1112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0683 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0429 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0935 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0892 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Ecuador or Peru?
Peru, at 0.0841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Ecuador and Peru?
0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Ecuador ranks 115th and Peru ranks 113th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Peru: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/peru/">Ecuador vs Peru: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.